On writing hymns – three thoughts from Martin Leckebusch

Martin Leckebusch is one of our most prolific contemporary hymn writers. At the latest count he’d written just a few short of 500 hymns (seven of them in Singing the Faith), 150 of which are metrical paraphrases of psalms.

During a wide-ranging interview with Singing the Faith Plus, Martin touched on a number of issues on which he has reflected during the course of his hymn-writing career, in particular the three below. They are not everything he thinks about when he’s writing, but they are important matters for him. We thought they were worth sharing here, both to highlight issues that any aspiring hymn writer may wish to consider, and also to encourage wider discussion.

So – in no particular order…

© 2015 Thinkstock UK, a division of Getty Images

Increasing our ‘linguistic base’

Martin observes that “intelligent discipleship means applying unchanging truth to a changing world in a way which will genuinely honour God.”

In other words, while there things about God’s relationship with us and the world that remain constant, we need to acknowledge that the world is changing. Those changes include the language we use and the way we describe that world and our relationship with God.

It’s a balancing act, but it comes down to taking care to avoid using Christian ‘jargon’ as a prop when expressing our faith in words. In More than Words, Martin’s 2000 collection of hymns, he writes:

Too often our ‘religious’ language is alien to outsiders or new Christians. Even worse, we indulge in a kind of linguistic schizophrenia when we use one set of vocabulary on Sundays (save, splendour, blessing, cleanse, magnify) and another (rescue, brilliance, benefit, wash, applaud) on Mondays. It is all too easy to divorce faith from daily living!

He adds: “We need a wider linguistic base – expressing ideas in a fresh way. Some words are threaded through hymns too easily.” He mentions Fred Kaan, for example – “who pushed the boundaries out in terms of what one could write about and the language one could use to write about it.”

© 2015 Thinkstock UK, a division of Getty Images

Inclusive language

Over the years, Martin has become more attuned to the value of inclusive language than he was at first. More specifically, he is open to using inclusive language for people.

“Male language is not something that grates with me,” he says. “But I heard Janet Wootton [a writer, academic and minister in the United Reformed Church] speak about how she had become ‘invisible’ when she went to church growing up”. She and other women were deemed to be covered by the use of such words as ‘mankind’ and ‘men’. Martin is respectful of this concern. “Following St Paul in his first letter to the Corinthians, which speaks about respect for those who’ve got different convictions, I don’t see that it’s necessarily helpful if I insist on writing in all masculine language if there are those who find that difficult.”

He has more of a problem with using non-male language for the Godhead – “I’m on the edge of where I feel comfortable talking about a feminine Spirit. Though I understand that the word for Spirit is feminine in Hebrew, I remain careful about how I express this in my texts.” (Whereas, for example, the writer Brian Wren has revised many of his earlier, well-known hymns in order to speak of God in non-male terms.)

© 2015 Thinkstock UK, a division of Getty Images

Rhythm and rhyme

As an aspiring hymn writer, Martin sent some of his early texts to Timothy Dudley-Smith, one of the leading hymn writers of his generation. In due course, a reply came back that included some detailed comments about Martin’s writing. He remembers: “I had to read it several times before I knew whether he as saying ‘Carry on’ or ‘Give up’.”

Dudley-Smith’s criticisms were formative for Martin. He wrote, in particular, about lax rhymes and, nowadays, Martin is insistent on the importance of rhyme in hymns – “too many modern hymns don’t bother”, he says. Nor was Martin’s early use of metre strict enough. Dudley-Smith reminded him that he was writing hymns for a congregation, not songs for a soloist – which can be freer in rhythm. (See Ian Worsfold’s guide to hymn metre.)

Taking time

Dudley-Smith’s summary advice for Martin was to “tidy up” his texts. Nowadays, he says, Martin takes his time. He gets his first thoughts down on paper or screen – and then lets them sit for a while in order to get some distance from them. “I will leave a text to lie for a month before returning to it with a critical eye.”

Categories: Leckebusch, Martin E., Making the most of hymns, Worship Resources.

4 Responses to On writing hymns – three thoughts from Martin Leckebusch

  1. Andrew Brown says:

    I am a great admirer of Martin’s hymns and am a firm believer in ‘taking time’. What seemed good or appropriate when first written can often be improved when approached later.

    However, I am less sure about Martin’s comments on rhyme, particularly as neither of my two hymns on Singing the Faith Plus contain rhymes. Also, whilst I understand that many people find non-male language for God difficult, I believe modern hymn-writers have an obligation to avoid it whenever possible. That does not necessarily mean using feminine language but does challenge us to explore a wider range of possible words rather than simply relying upon the conventional.

    • Glyn Jenkins (Rev) says:

      As one who worked with Fred Kaan and others, I have always welcomed well-written new hymns with open arms, believing that contemporary worship needs creativity and an inventive mind. Music and words need to form a marriage that reflect each other. That is why some new hymns sung to old tunes do not easily gell because of the association of the tune with original words. As an organist in a United URC/Methodist Church I welcome Singing the Faith, finding hidden gems from time to time. We plan to use “Thank God for life” and would like permission to print the words – message to Andrew Brown please. An acknowledgement will be printed.

  2. Dominic Grant says:

    Yes, good pointers here… although I’d tentatively suggest that, whilst Martin’s quite right to be cautious about Christian ‘jargon’, the ‘widening of the linguistic base’ ought at its best to go both ways – extending the vocabulary of church and broader culture alike.

    Also, one correction: Revd Dr Janet Wootton is a minister in the Congregational Federation, not the United Reformed Church.

  3. David Wood says:

    I agree entirely, I have recently started hymn writing having written over 500 poems in many different poetry styles and agree about rhyme and strict meter length and striking a balance in the use of language. I think one concern in writing modern lyrics is most traditional churches still use the church organ as the main ‘musical instrument’ of choice as there may be nothing else and some lyrics/tunes may be more suitable for guitar, violin and keyboard.

Leave a comment below

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>